History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nelson v. Ryan
222 A.D. 754
N.Y. App. Div.
1927
Check Treatment

Order and judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that plaintiff presented a prima facie ease. The dismissal was not upon the merits. A dismissal in an equity case, without findings of fact and conclusions of law, must be regarded as a non-suit. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 441; Stephenson v. Southerland, 150 App. Div. 275; Ross v. Caywood, 162 N. Y. 259; Ware v. Dos Passos, Id. 281; Mc Nulty Brothers v. Offerman, 141 App. Div. 730.) If it be the intent to dismiss upon the merits, a decision must be made pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act. This rule is not changed by section 482 of the act. Young, Rich, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., concurs in result.

Case Details

Case Name: Nelson v. Ryan
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1927
Citation: 222 A.D. 754
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.