History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nelson v. Darling
103 Cal. App. 523
Cal. Ct. App.
1930
Check Treatment
BURNELL, J., pro tem.

This cause is before us on the respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal taken from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles. The action was for the recovery of real estate broker’s commissions, and it is evident from an inspection of the clerk’s transcript that the cause of action arose within the city of Los Angeles, where the plaintiff brokers had their office and where the agreement for exchange of properties and payment of commissions was entered into.

Where the cause of action in a suit commenced in the Municipal Court arises, as disclosed by the record therein, in the city in which such court is situated, an appeal lies only to the Superior Court, and the judgment of that tribunal is final. (Johnston v. Wolf, 208 Cal. 286 [280 Pac. 980]; Nelson v. Thomas, ante, p. 108 [283 Pac. 982].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Craig, Acting P. J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Nelson v. Darling
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 29, 1930
Citation: 103 Cal. App. 523
Docket Number: Civ. No. 5874
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.