| Mass. | Jan 6, 1953

Lummus, J.

In this case the wife obtained a decree nisi for divorce on March 10,1952. The husband appealed. The wife applied to the Probate Court for an allowance with which to defend against that appeal. On May 26, 1952, the judge ordered the husband to pay into court $500 for the use of the wife. The husband appealed from that order. On request of the husband, the judge found as the material facts that the wife intends to defend against the husband’s appeal in good faith, that to prepare her case will require analysis, condensation and summarizing of the evidence, and that the husband is able to pay and in fairness ought to pay the wife $500 for that purpose.

By G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 208, § 38, as it appears in St. 1933, c. 288, the court in a divorce case may “award costs and expenses” to either party “whether or not the marital relation has terminated.” .Such an award may include counsel fees. Hayden v. Hayden, 326 Mass. 587" court="Mass." date_filed="1950-12-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hayden-v-hayden-2033067?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2033067">326 Mass. 587, 594. Sack v. Sack, 328 *644Mass. 600, 605. The principle, stated in Hayden v. Hayden, supra, at page 595, that the power to award costs and expenses ceases when the litigation is terminated, has no application here, for the appeal kept the litigation alive. Gale v. Nickerson, 144 Mass. 415" court="Mass." date_filed="1887-05-09" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/gale-v-nickerson-6422453?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6422453">144 Mass. 415, 416. The amount of the allowance is supported by the findings of the judge.

Decree affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.