History
  • No items yet
midpage
Negro William Richardson's Case
5 D.C. 338
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1837
Check Treatment
Cranch, C. J.,

was also of opinion that the commitment was not sufficient, as it did not state any conviction by the justice, or even an opinion that the prisoner was a runaway; but a mere assertion that he was charged as a runaway; and said that the magistrate is bound to examine the case, and be satisfied by competent evidence on oath that the person is a runaway.

He gave no opinion upon the question whether the Maryland laws upon this subject were applicable to this county.

The CouRT (Thruston, J., absent,) ordered the prisoner to be discharged, because the warrant of commitment was insufficient, and because they were satisfied that he was not a runaway.

Case Details

Case Name: Negro William Richardson's Case
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Nov 15, 1837
Citation: 5 D.C. 338
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In