91 Iowa 256 | Iowa | 1894
It is contended by appellee that the instruction is without prejudice, or is not reversible error. It is not a case in which there was an instruction as to some in
There are no other questions that we think it necessary to consider, in view of a new trial. There is a claim that the first and fifth instructions are in conflict, but the suggestions here will be sufficient to avoid it hereafter. The judgment is reversed.