History
  • No items yet
midpage
Neely v. Commonwealth
45 Va. App. 399
Va. Ct. App.
2005
Check Treatment

Upon a Rehearing En Banc

By published opinion dated November 9, 2004, a divided panel of this Court reversed the judgment of the trial court. See Neely v. Commonwealth, 44 Va.App. 239, 604 S.E.2d 733 (2004). We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted a rehearing en banc, 44 Va.App. 535, 605 S.E.2d 777 (2004).

Upon rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the stay of the November 9, 2004 mandate is lifted and the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded to the trial court for the reasons set forth in the majority panel opinion.

Chief Judge FITZPATRICK, Judges BUMGARDNER, FELTON and HALEY dissent for the reasons set forth in the panel dissent. See 44 Va.App. at 244-47, 604 S.E.2d at 735-36.

It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the *400appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

Case Details

Case Name: Neely v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Apr 12, 2005
Citation: 45 Va. App. 399
Docket Number: Record No. 2325-03-1
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.