History
  • No items yet
midpage
Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc.
948 So. 2d 844
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2007
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court denying his motions to compel discovery. As we have repeatedly observed, orders having the effect of denying discovery are almost invariably not reviewable by certiorari because of the absence of irreparable harm. See Boyd v. Pheo, Inc., 664 So.2d 294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Esman v. Bd. of Regents, 425 So.2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Inasmuch as any error by the circuit court will be readily remediable on appeal, this case presents no basis for departing from this general rule. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Neeley v. CW Roberts Contracting, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 30, 2007
Citation: 948 So. 2d 844
Docket Number: No. 1D06-6675
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.