History
  • No items yet
midpage
Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona
501 U.S. 1216
SCOTUS
1991
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until July 8, 1991, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice MARSHALL and Justice STEVENS,

dissenting:

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U.S. 928, 104 S.Ct. 331, 78 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983), we would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Case Details

Case Name: Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 17, 1991
Citation: 501 U.S. 1216
Docket Number: No. 90-7740
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.