History
  • No items yet
midpage
Needham v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
48 Misc. 522
N.Y. App. Term.
1905
Check Treatment
Scott, J.

There was no proof of negligence. All that is testified to is by the plaintiff that, as he walked toward the door, the train came to a ā€œ sudden stop ā€ and he was thrown down. This is not sufficient to justify the inference that defendant or any of its servants was negligent. The complaint should have been dismissed.

Bischoff and Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

Complaint dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Needham v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1905
Citation: 48 Misc. 522
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.