33 Ind. 294 | Ind. | 1870
The first question to which our attention is called in the case arises upon the ruling of the court in
A question is made as to the sufficiency of the fourth paragraph of the reply. We think it was good.
The court, to which the cause was submitted for trial, found for the appellee the amount of the note and interest; and it is claimed that the finding was excessive, from the evidence. This claim is, in part, based on the paragraph of the answer alleging a mistake made in drawing the note, by which it was made for too large a sum. The evidence fails to show the consideration for which the note was given. It was drawn by the appellant himself, and the evidence does not show that there was any error in the amount; and, in the absence of such proof, the amount named in the note must bo presumed to be correct. But it is further urged that the appellant should have been allowed the amount claimed as a set-off on the account set up for services, &c.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, and five per cent, damages.