ORDER
This case is before the court on application for enforcement of an order of
*426
the Board and cross-petition to review and set aside the order which is reported at
Upon consideration of the record as a whole, we are of the opinion that substantial evidence supports the finding as to violation of Section 8(a)(1), though we find no coercive interrogation in the conversations between foreman Simpson and employee Clark or supervisor Whittle and employee Rigsby which were relied upon in part by the Administrative Law Judge and the Board.
It is therefore ordered that enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.
