History
  • No items yet
midpage
National Labor Relations Board v. Signal Manufacturing Company
351 F.2d 471
| 1st Cir. | 1965
|
Check Treatment

351 F.2d 471

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
SIGNAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 6563.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Heard Oct. 4, 1965.
Decided Oct. 14, 1965.

Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, were on brief, for petitioner.

Maurice Epstein, Boston, Mass., for respondent.

Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE, Circuit Judge, and CAFFREY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

With considerable reluctance, we affirm the NLRB's decision that the employer must continue to deal with the union through the union's steward Silvia, in spite of the fact that on the day of the company founder's death, Silvia, upon learning of the fact said, 'Good, why didn't he take (the director of manufacturing) * * * with him.' Although we believe the Board's concession that Silvia's remark, at least so far as the founder was concerned, 'may' have been 'ill-advised, and even offensive' to be an understatement, its conclusion that it was insufficient to warrant the employer's refusal to deal must be regarded as an administrative finding within the Board's expertise. The right of employees to be represented by officials of their own choice doubtless must outweigh any principle of persona non grata.

2

An order will be entered enforcing the order of the Board.

Case Details

Case Name: National Labor Relations Board v. Signal Manufacturing Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Oct 14, 1965
Citation: 351 F.2d 471
Docket Number: 6563_1
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.