93 N.E.2d 31 | Ohio Ct. App. | 1949
This appeal on questions of law was taken from an order sustaining a demurrer to a cross-petition and a judgment dismissing it. *463
The action started as one for property damage allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendant in a collision of his automobile at a highway intersection with that of the plaintiff, Ernest Warner, with whom plaintiff, National-Ben Franklin Insurance Company, had a subrogation contract. Their petition was filed September 17, 1947.
November 29, 1947, plaintiff, Ernest Warner, died and Clara V. Warner was appointed administratrix of his estate. December 18, 1947, as such administratrix, she filed a motion to be substituted for her decedent herein and for an order reviving the cause, and it was granted the same day. August 24, 1948, the insurance company and the administratrix filed an amended petition which was identical with the petition except as the administratrix took the place of the decedent.
September 9, 1948, defendant filed his answer to the petition and with it his cross-petition for damages for personal injuries to himself and property damage to his automobile, both allegedly caused by the negligence of decedent, Ernest Warner, in the intersection collision of their automobiles. A general demurrer to the cross-petition was filed by the administratrix, and was sustained and the cross-petition dismissed because it did not allege that defendant's claim against the estate had been presented to the administratrix within four months of her appointment as required by Section 10509-112, General Code.
If presentation of such claim was required, that it was done must be alleged in an action therefor, or the cross-petition was subject to demurrer. Beach, Recr., v. Mizner, Exr.,
Was presentation necessary? Defendant answers "No," and citesGoehring v. Dillard,
When this cross-petition was filed it was strictly a claim against the estate and there existed every reason why it should have been presented to the administratrix for her allowance or rejection as provided by the statute, the purpose of which is to facilitate the prompt administration of estates.
In Benson, Admx., v. Rosine,
Judgment affirmed.
CONN and FESS, JJ., concur. *465