Nathan v. State, 520 So. 2d 317

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from appellant’s conviction of battery and affray, we find error only in that the trial court delegated to appellant’s probation or community control officer the determination of the amount of restitution appellant was to make. On remand, the amount of any restitution to be imposed shall be determined by the trial court. Mansell v. State, 498 So.2d 604 (Fla.2d DCA 1986); Buchanan v. State, 483 So.2d 537 (Fla.2d DCA 1986). Appellant’s convictions are otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Nathan v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Feb 24, 1988

Citations: 520 So. 2d 317; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 539; 1988 WL 13734; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 674; No. 86-2801

Docket Number: No. 86-2801

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.