History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nathan v. State
131 Ga. 48
Ga.
1908
Check Treatment
Fish, C. J.

(After stating the facts.) The charges on the subject of malice, upon which error was assigned, were given while the court was instructing the jury on that subject and explaining to them the difference between express malice and implied malice. The headnotes, when considered in connection with the preceding statement of facts, need no elaboration.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Nathan v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 15, 1908
Citation: 131 Ga. 48
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.