History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nathan Hill v. Warden Streeval
20-7637
| 4th Cir. | Jul 22, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan L. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathan L. Hill, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Streeval , No. 7:20-cv-00309-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. June 9, 2020; Oct. 19, 2020). We deny Hill’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Nathan Hill v. Warden Streeval
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 22, 2021
Docket Number: 20-7637
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.