History
  • No items yet
midpage
170 F. App'x 15
8th Cir.
2006
PER CURIAM.
PER CURIAM.
PER CURIAM.
Notes

Paul A. CULBREATH, Appellant, v. Carl Dwayne PLUMLEE, Appellee.

No. 05-1550

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

March 3, 2006

Submitted: Feb. 28, 2006.

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Paul Culbreath appeals the district court‘s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against defendants. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. FAG Bearings Corp., 335 F.3d 752, 757 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo standard of review), we agree with the district court that Culbreath is collaterally estopped from bringing his claim, for the reasons explained in the district court‘s opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Paul A. Culbreath, Jonesboro, AR, Pro Se.

Robert Lee Henry, III, Barber & McCaskill, Little Rock, AR, for Defendant-Appellee.

Paul Culbreath appeals the district court‘s adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil action against Carl Dwayne Plumlee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

March 3, 2006

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Paul Culbreath appeals the district court‘s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil action against Carl Dwayne Plumlee. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Madewell v. Downs, 68 F.3d 1030, 1036 (8th Cir.1995) (de novo standard of review), we agree with the district court that Culbreath‘s allegations were either time-barred or meritless, for the reasons explained in the district court‘s opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Natalie JOHNSON-LEE; Dean Zimmerman; Eric Makela; Shane Price; Tom Taylor; Lisa Crockett; Travis Lee; Pauline Thomas; Lani Hogan; Stephen Goodell; Brady Baker; Steven Wash; Ken Bradley; Cam Gordon, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Defendants/Appellee.

No. 04-4203

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

March 3, 2006

Submitted: Sept. 12, 2005.

Larry B. Leventhal, Randall Morris, David L. Garelick, Leventhal & Associates, Michael C. Hager, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Clifford M. Greene, Kevin G. Ross, Pamela Lee Vanderwiel, Greene & Espel, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants-Appellee.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the district court‘s1 grant of summary judgment dismissing their claims against the City of Minneapolis alleging its Redistricting Commission‘s Redistricting Plan violated various provisions of Minneapolis‘s City Charter as well as Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 1973-1973p); 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions de novo, Lerohl v. Friends of Minn. Sinfonia, 322 F.3d 486, 488 (8th Cir.2003), we conclude an extensive discussion is not warranted. The district court has provided a comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion addressing the issues raised by the parties, and we have nothing to add to the analysis. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reason‘s stated in its memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Michael Dean MOORE, Appellant, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., doing business as The Trane Company, Appellee.

No. 04-3162

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

March 3, 2006

Submitted March 1, 2006.

Notes

1
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Case Details

Case Name: Natalie Johnson-Lee v. City of Minneapolis
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 3, 2006
Citations: 170 F. App'x 15; 04-4203
Docket Number: 04-4203
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In