Natalie A. Tao
Before KING, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Natalie A. Tao petitions for a writ of mandamus in relation to her voluntary Chapter 13 petition in bankruptcy, seeking an order directing the bankruptcy court to disqualify the Trustee; require the Trustee to credit certain plan payments and preserve and reconstruct certain documents; provide ADA-compliant access to all proceedings; recover certain assets; prohibit certain parties from participating in proceedings; and abstain from retaliating against her. Tao further requests that this court stay any collection or enforcement proceedings pending the resolution of this petition.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner “has a clear and indisputable right to” the relief she seeks and “has no other adequate means . . . to attain the desired relief.” In re Moore, 955 F.3d 384, 388 (4th Cir. 2020) (citation modified). Our review of the bankruptcy court‘s docket leads us to conclude that the dismissal of Tao‘s voluntary Chapter 13 petition pursuant to
Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus and deny as moot Tao‘s motion for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
PETITION DENIED