No. 622 | SCOTUS | Mar 9, 1931

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. New York ex rel. Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U.S. 152" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1907-01-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/new-york-ex-rel-hatch-v-reardon-96569?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96569">204 U. S. 152, 160; Hooker v. Burr, 194 U.S. 415" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1904-05-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hooker-v-burr-96103?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96103">194 U. S. 415; Ohio *786v. Akron Park District, 281 U.S. 74" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1930-03-12" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ohio-ex-rel-bryant-v-akron-metropolitan-park-district-101534?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="101534">281 U. S. 74, 81.

Mr. Fitzgerald Hall for appellant. Mr. Joseph, W. Byms for appellees.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.