History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nash v. Sunstream Equipment Co.
441 So. 2d 1153
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1983
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Talquin Electric Cooperative, Inc., v. Amchem Products, Inc., 421 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Rice v. Florida Power & Light Co., 363 So.2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Zerwal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 332 So.2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Holmes v. School Board of Orange County, 301 So.2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Somers v. Meyers, 171 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965).

Case Details

Case Name: Nash v. Sunstream Equipment Co.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 22, 1983
Citation: 441 So. 2d 1153
Docket Number: No. 82-2663
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.