History
  • No items yet
midpage
724 A.2d 798
N.J.
1999

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.






Dissenting Opinion

POLLOCK, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s majority opinion, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — Justice POLLOCK — 1.

Case Details

Case Name: Nash v. Lerner
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 17, 1999
Citations: 724 A.2d 798; 1999 N.J. LEXIS 81; 157 N.J. 535
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In