History
  • No items yet
midpage
Napoleon v. McCullough
89 N.J.L. 716
N.J.
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Tkenchard, Bergen, Black, "White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 10.

For reversal—ISTone.

Case Details

Case Name: Napoleon v. McCullough
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 20, 1916
Citation: 89 N.J.L. 716
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.