Napoleon v. McCullough

89 N.J.L. 716 | N.J. | 1916

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Tkenchard, Bergen, Black, "White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 10.

For reversal—ISTone.