History
  • No items yet
midpage
Napier v. State
338 So. 2d 463
Ala. Crim. App.
1976
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction of possession of a variety of controlled substances. The general issue on Count 1 (quaalude), Count 3 (morphine sulfate), Count 4 (pantapon), and Count 5 (methamphetamine) resulted in a general verdict of guilty with a fine of $25,000. The trial judge sentenced Napier to five years penitentiary punishment.

The only two adverse rulings worthy of comment are correct under Brantley, 294 Ala. 344, 317 So.2d 345 (multiplicity of drugs in evidence) and Cassell, 55 Ala.App. 502, 317 So.2d 348 (non legislative ascribing methaquaalude to controlled substance list ex post facto by the non-elected State Board of Health).

Hence, the judgment below is

AFFIRMED.

TYSON, HARRIS, DeCARLO and BOOKOUT, JJ., concur. CATES, P. J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

CATES, Presiding Judge

(dissenting):

I think Brantley, supra, is wrong, but our elder brethren have spoken.

However, Cassell’, supra, was never squarely laid before them. I repeat my dissent therein.

Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Napier v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Oct 12, 1976
Citation: 338 So. 2d 463
Docket Number: 1 Div. 693
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.