History
  • No items yet
midpage
Napier v. Dilday
38 Okla. 365
Okla.
1913
Check Treatment

The record shows that the finding made against the plaintiffs in error, upon which the judgment was rendered, was with the consent of their counsel. Consent ends all contention between the parties, and there is nothing to review on appeal.Baker v. Van Ness et al., 37 Okla. 122, 130 P. 536; Schmidtv. Oregon Gold Mining Co., 28 Or. 9, 40 P. 406, 1014, 52 Am. St. Rep. 759, and authorities therein cited.

The proceeding in error is dismissed.

All the Justices concur. *Page 366

Case Details

Case Name: Napier v. Dilday
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Jun 10, 1913
Citation: 38 Okla. 365
Docket Number: 4810
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.