History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nance v. State
453 So. 2d 761
Ala. Crim. App.
1984
Check Treatment

It affirmatively appearing that the appellant's probation was revoked and that she was not given "[a] written statement by the judge as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation", as required by Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100,103, 312 So.2d 620 (1975), this cause is remanded with directions that the requirements and guidelines set forth inArmstrong be satisfied.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All Judges concur.

ON RETURN TO REMAND
The return to remand shows that the appellant's probation revocation was in full compliance with Armstrong, supra. Therefore, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

OPINION EXTENDED;

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Nance v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: May 8, 1984
Citation: 453 So. 2d 761
Docket Number: 8 Div. 4
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.