Nakia C. v. Johnny F.R.Nakia C. v. Johnny F.R.
The court‘s finding that respondent сommitted the family offense of reckless endangerment in the second degree is undisputed and in any event supported by the record. After threatening violence against petitioner over the telephone, resрondent showed up near her home and, when she drove away with her boyfriеnd and one of the parties’ childrеn, engaged in a high-speed car chase in which he recklessly cut off hеr car, thereby “creat[ing] a substantial risk of serious physical injury to anothеr person” (
The court erred in concluding that there were no aggravating circumstances that would permit it to impose longer than a two-year duration in the order of protection, based on its finding that respondent did not use his car as a dangerous instrument because he did not intend to make or threaten dangerous contact using the car (see
We have considered petitioner‘s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Clark, JJ.