Naidech v. U. C. C. of New Jersey
134 N.J.L. 232
| N.J. | 1946

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court. *Page 233 For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, OLIPHANT, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.