History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nagle v. Conard
80 N.J. Eq. 253
N.J.
1912
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chancellor Howell.

' For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Ykedenburgei, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy—15.

For reversal—Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: Nagle v. Conard
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 20, 1912
Citation: 80 N.J. Eq. 253
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.