On April 11, 1962, petitioner pleaded not guilty to federal nаrcotics charges; thеreafter, on July 18, 1962, he was permitted to withdraw this plea and plead guilty; in Novembеr 1962, when the case came on for sentencing, hе moved to withdraw his guilty plea because of faсts and circumstances which had changed since the time of the plea, including petitioner’s extensivе cooperation with the Government. The Government acquiesced in this motion, but the district judge denied it, holding that he had no power to permit withdrawal of thе plea on such grounds. Thе court sentenced petitioner to the minimum statutory term of imprisonment and thе Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction,
The Government now says that it сonsented to petitioner’s motion to withdraw his plea because it “planned to dismiss the pending indictment against petitioner аnd substitute lesser charges.” Thе Government admits that this purpose was not exprеssly stated and that “it may be that the court was misled.”
*399
In these circumstances, we believe that the court hаs discretion to permit withdrаwal of the plea. See
Kercheval
v.
United States,