History
  • No items yet
midpage
N. A. N. A., Inc. v. Lake & Danenhower, Inc.
234 A.D. 735
N.Y. App. Div.
1931
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that the writing designated Exhibit A and made part of the defense sought to be stricken out for insufficiency when considered as a whole, clearly expresses a binding contract between the parties within the purview of Sanders v. P. B. F. Co. (144 N. Y. 209). We are here concerned with a matter of pleading only. Whether evidence adduced at the trial concerning the surrounding facts and circumstances which led to the signing of this agreement may lead to any different conclusion is a question we may not now decide. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: N. A. N. A., Inc. v. Lake & Danenhower, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1931
Citation: 234 A.D. 735
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.