Myers v. Urich

1 Binn. 25 | Pa. | 1801

Per Curiam.

The ground of the defence is that Urich was compelled by due course of law to pay the amount of the bond to the plaintiff in the foreign attachment; but the fact is that he was not compelled by due course of law; for he could not be legally compelled unless the proceedings against him were regular, and the security required by the act of Assembly was duly entered.

Judgment for Plaintiff.