Myers v. Urich
1 Binn. 25 | Pa. | 1801
The ground of the defence is that Urich was compelled by due course of law to pay the amount of the bond to the plaintiff in the foreign attachment; but the fact is that he was not compelled by due course of law; for he could not be legally compelled unless the proceedings against him were regular, and the security required by the act of Assembly was duly entered.
Judgment for Plaintiff.
