Myers v. State
579 So. 2d 924 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1991
We affirm the sentence of appellant as an habitual offender. However, we remand for correction of the “Order Finding Defendant to be an Habitual Violent Felony Offender.” At the sentencing hearing and on the written sentence, the court found appellant to be only an habitual offender. Therefore, the order enumerating reasons must be corrected to find that the court was sentencing as an habitual offender, not an habitual violent offender.