midpage

Myer v. ColeMyer v. Cole

New York Supreme Court
Oct 15, 1815
Reporters:
Per Curiam.

The declaration is clearly bad. The cause of action, stated in the last count, ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‍arose after the death of the testatrix, and could not be joined with a cause of action arising in her lifetime. It would require different judgments. The defendants ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‍would be personally liable On the cause of action as stated in that count; for the promise is not alleged to have been made by them as executors. They ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‍were only named as executors, as a mere des crip tio persona, (Bridgen v. Parkes, 2 Bos. & Pull. 424. Jennings v. Newman, 4 Term Rep. 347. Carter v. Phelps‘s administrator, 8 Johns. Rep. 440.) That the funeral expenses of the defendants’ testatrix would be payable out of ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‍her estate, is no answer to the form of the declaration. It was a cause of action arising after her death, and for which she could have made ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‍no promise. There must be judgment for the defendants, with leave to amend, on payment of costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Myer v. Cole
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1815
Citation: 12 Johns. 349
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Log In