MW Zack Metal Co. v. INT'L NAVIGATION CORP. OF MONROVIA, 67 N.Y.2d 892

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 865). We add that there was no prejudice to plaintiff in the Appellate Division’s having dealt with the motions as ones for summary judgment even though Special Term’s consideration of them was only as motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. Defendants’ motion and cross motion were stated to have been made pursuant to CPLR 3212. Moreover, plaintiff’s answering affidavit acknowledged in several places that defendants’ motions were for summary judgment and plaintiff responded to the motions by setting forth factual data in support of the allegations of the complaint (Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100, 103; O’Hara v Del Bello, 47 NY2d 363, 367-368; see, Rich v Lefkovits, 56 NY2d 276, 281-283).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Case Details

Case Name: MW Zack Metal Co. v. INT'L NAVIGATION CORP. OF MONROVIA

Court Name: New York Court of Appeals

Date Published: Apr 1, 1986

Citations: 67 N.Y.2d 892; 492 N.E.2d 1219; 501 N.Y.S.2d 803; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17999

Court Abbreviation: N.Y.