Mutual Life Insurance v. McCurdy, 103 N.Y.S. 837

Mutual Life Insurance v. McCurdy

103 N.Y.S. 837 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1907

Laughlin, J.:

This is an action at law to recover various sums of money, aggregating $1,002,841.66, alleged to have been wrongfully abstracted from the plaintiff by the defendants, who are father and son, acting in concert and pursuant to a preconceived plan by which they fraudulently conspired and agreed at a time when the father was president of the company, to obtain, and did obtain, large sums of money from it for the benefit of the defendant Robert H. McCurdy, the son, through the employment of a firm of which he was a member, as an agent of the company, on an unusual contract of agency, *828made without authority; by which the firm was paid exorbitant commissions grossly in excess of the fair and reasonable compensation for the services rendered, and by the appointment of the defendant Robert H. McCurdy to the office of. superintendent of the foreign department of the plain tiff at an exorbitant salary, grossly in excess' of the fair and reasonable compensation for the services rendered. The allegations of the complaint aré sufficiently definite. Although renewals of the agreements from time to time at increased commissions are alleged, yet it is alleged that this was pursuant- to the original corrupt, fraudulent agreement and com spiracy, and, therefore, they merely constituted steps in the consuim mation of the single scheme, plan and purpose conceived at the outset to - wrongfully and fraudulently obtain the moneys from the company. The complaint states but á single cause- of action to recover the money's lost, to the company through the fraudulent acts of the defendants, acting in concert in executing a preconceived conspiracy to obtain the moneys from the company wrongfully and without authority. (People v. Tweed, 63 N. Y. 194; Bosworth v. Allen, 168 id. 157, 165 ; Mabon v. Miller, 81 App. Div. 10.)

It follows that the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.