History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murry v. Daughtry
133 P. 1070
N.M.
1913
Check Treatment

OPINION OP THE COURT.

HANNA, J. —

There are two. motions, for our consideration, for the dismissal of the appeal, raising substantially the same questions. The grounds assigned in support of the motion for a dismissal as to the appellant, Clara Murry, are all incorporated in the motion for' dismissal as to the appellant, Sarah Jane Murry, which, however, incorporates additional grounds. Neither of these motions are supported by brief or argument.

We are disposed to believe that motions not deemed worthy of argument are so lightly considered by the party presenting same, that our time should not be consumed by an investigation into their merits.

For the reasons stated the motions are overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Murry v. Daughtry
Court Name: New Mexico Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 9, 1913
Citation: 133 P. 1070
Docket Number: No. 1506
Court Abbreviation: N.M.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.