History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murray v. Stribling
110 S.E. 761
Ga. Ct. App.
1922
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

ā€œ The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not having demanded the verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.ā€ Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300). See also Bingham v. Haines, 25 Ga. App. 136 (3) (102 S. E. 923), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. F. A. McWhorter, for plaintiff in error. Homer Legg, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Murray v. Stribling
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 14, 1922
Citation: 110 S.E. 761
Docket Number: 12830
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.