midpage

Murray v. StateMurray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Apr 2, 1980
No. 79-1839
Versions:382 So. 2d 765
1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15864
PER CURIAM.

Section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a trial court, when imposing adult sanctions on a juvenile convicted of a crime, make findings of fact and set forth reasons showing those sanctions to be in conformity with the criteria of Section 39.111(6)(c). The record here reveals that the trial judge failed to refer to all of the six criteria mentioned in that section when he sentenced appellant.

We affirm, the judgment of the trial court, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to Section 39.-111(6). See Proctor v. State, 373 So.2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 371 So.2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

SCHEB, Acting C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Murray v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 2, 1980
Citations: 382 So. 2d 765; 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15864; No. 79-1839
Docket Number: No. 79-1839
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In