Murray v. SelskyMurray v. Selsky
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report, related documentation and hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored the report and the inmate who petitioner threatened (see Matter of Williams v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1426, 1426-1427 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 703 [2008]). As for petitioner‘s denial of the allegations against him, a credibility
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.