History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murray v. Rozier
186 Ga. App. 184
Ga. Ct. App.
1988
Check Treatment
Carley, Judge.

Appellant-defendant has filed this direct appeal from the grant of appellee-plaintiff’s motion for new trial. The grant of a motion for new trial is not a final order from which a direct appeal may be taken. See Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bishop, 170 Ga. App. 9 (316 SE2d 167) (1984); Days Inn of America v. Sharkey, 178 Ga. App. 718 (344 SE2d 518) (1986). Since appellant did not comply with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), this appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Banke, P. J., and Benham, J., concur. Ronald B. Thomas, W. Vincent Settle III, for appellee.

Case Details

Case Name: Murray v. Rozier
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 3, 1988
Citation: 186 Ga. App. 184
Docket Number: 75174
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.