History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murray v. Plastridge, Inc.
338 So. 2d 260
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1976
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and appellate record we are of the opinion that the appellant having been the prevailing party and the party recovering judgment was entitled to the taxing of costs in his favor. Jordan v. Reynolds, 154 So.2d 200 (Fla.3d DCA 1963); Blynn v. Hirsch, 136 So.2d 666 (Fla.3d DCA 1962); F.S. § 57.041. Accordingly, the order denying plaintiff’s motion to tax costs is vacated and set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Murray v. Plastridge, Inc.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 15, 1976
Citation: 338 So. 2d 260
Docket Number: No. 76-524
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.