History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murray v. Paisley
1 Yeates 197
Pa.
1792
Check Treatment
Per curiam.

The evidence is certainly admissible. The defendant is at liberty under his plea, to shew either a general or special property in himself, either by bill of sale., delivery from the plaintiff, contract or otherwise, and the rule of court respecting notice cannot be applied to such a case. The defendant is not bound to give information to his adversary under what pretensions he claims the articles in question; neither is the plaintiff under such necessity. The submission and award are evidence to prove the defendant’s claim, but not incontrovertible. The plaintiff is also at liberty to shew misbehaviour or partiality in the arbitrators, and bring forward every legal exception to the submission and award.

Verdict for the defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Murray v. Paisley
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 15, 1792
Citation: 1 Yeates 197
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.