Murphy v. Stanley
136 Mass. 133 | Mass. | 1883
1. The defendant’s motive in removing the sleepers was immaterial; and, on cross-examination, such evidence may be admitted or excluded, in the discretion of the presiding judge.
2. The second exception falls within the same rule.
3 and 4. Oreasey’s conversations with the defendant’s clerk and workmen had no tendency to show that the defendant was negligent, and were properly excluded.
Exceptions overruled.