midpage

Murphy v. Rochester Telephone CompanyMurphy v. Rochester Telephone Company

New York Court of Appeals
May 5, 1925
Versions:240 N.Y. 629
148 N.E. 735
1925 N.Y. LEXIS 859

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: McLaughlin, J. Not voting: Pound, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Murphy v. Rochester Telephone Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 5, 1925
Citations: 240 N.Y. 629; 148 N.E. 735; 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 859
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In