History
  • No items yet
midpage
Murphy v. Fuld
2 Idaho 175
Idaho
1886
Check Treatment
HAYS, C. J.

This appeal is from the judgment. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. It nowhere appears in the transcript that defendant Bosa Fuld is married; hence the argument on that point cannot be considered. .We think the complaint will sustain the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Buck and Broderick, JJ., concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Murphy v. Fuld
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 8, 1886
Citation: 2 Idaho 175
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.