| N.J. | Oct 17, 1913

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison-, Tren-oi-iard, Parker, Bergen-, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, Teri-iune, Heppenheimer, JJ. 9.

For reversal — None.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.