| Me. | Jul 1, 1860

The opinion of the Court was drawn up by

Appleton, J.

The tendency of the evidence is to show a diversion of water from the plaintiff’s mill, arising from the acts of the defendants, which constitute the foundation of this suit. Wherever a right is invaded, the law presumes damage. Indeed, though no actual ‘injury be sustained, an action may be maintained for the wrongful diversion of water from the plaintiff’s mill, and nominal damages be recovered. Butman v. Hussey, 3 Fairf., 407. If one suffers his rights to be invaded, and acquiesc.es in an adverse claim for more than twenty years, this adverse enjoyment by lapse of time will ripen into a perfect title.

From the data before us, it is impossible satisfactorily to determine the value of water power at Calais, or the amount diverted, and the damages consequent thereupon. The defendants are to be defaulted, and the damages to be determined by the Court, or some one appointed by the Court for that purpose.. '

Tenney, O. J., Cutting, May, Goodenow and Kent, JJ., concurred.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.