31 S.W. 380 | Tex. Crim. App. | 1895
The appellant in this case was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years in the State penitentiary, and from the judgment and sentence of the lower court he prosecutes this appeal.
There is no statement of facts in this case. The indictment is in proper form, and the charge of the court is applicable to a state of facts that might have been proved. The appellant made a motion for a new trial in this case, on the ground that one of the jurors, Stonell by name, after the jury had retired, by some means procured a volume of the Texas Reports, and read the case of Prince v. The State. See
There being no error in the record, the case is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Judges all present and concurring. *474