History
  • No items yet
midpage
Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward
138 F. 1006
2d Cir.
1905
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We do not think it necessary to add anything to the opinion of the Circuit Judge. The evidence entirely warrants the finding of facts therein set forth, and upon those facts we fully concur in the conclusion that the dealings between plaintiff and its correspondents were dealings between principals and independent of the correspondents’ dealings, each with his own customers. The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Municipal Telegraph & Stock Co. v. Ward
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Jun 23, 1905
Citation: 138 F. 1006
Docket Number: No. 216
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.