164 Wis. 512 | Wis. | 1917
The following opinion was filed October 24, 1916:
The facts as found by the trial judge are set out in the statement of the case and it is unnecessary to further repeat them in this opinion. The negligence alleged is the dropping or throwing of a timber, causing one end to fall on plaintiff’s foot. It is conceded in the brief of counsel for respondent that the facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the trial court. We think it clear upon the undisputed evidence that this case is ruled by Schmit v. Frederickson, 160 Wis. 426, 150 N. W. 426. In that case two men were handling the timber, one at each end, and one man
Counsel for respondent relies upon Meo v. C. & N. W. R. Co. 138 Wis. 340, 120 N. W. 344. That case is clearly distinguishable from the instant case. In the Meo Case the rail was to be dropped upon signal given and the evidence was conflicting as to whether the rail was dropped before the customary signal had been given by the foreman. We think it clear that there was no evidence to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, therefore the judgment must be reversed.
By the Court. — The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the action.
A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $10 costs, on January 16, 1917.